YKK 80 Building, Tokyo



One sheet of aluminum fabric (60 m wide by 40 m [197 ft by 131 ft] tall) faces Tokyo’s urban area.

Rainer Viertlböck

Designed immediately after the March 2011 earthquake and tsunami disaster in Japan, YKK Headquarters reprioritized its sustainability and resiliency goals to become one of the highest performing office buildings in Tokyo. This project is important as a high-performing thermal, visual, and energy design, and as a resilient design response to a natural disaster — something more of our buildings will experience as climate challenges mount.

Located in the metropolitan city of Tokyo, the new YKK headquarters building is named “YKK 80” because it was completed in 2014, which marked the 80th year since the company was founded.

Tragically, in March 2011, just one month after design began, the Great East Japan Earthquake and disaster occurred. Japan rapidly shut down all of its nuclear power plants (nearly 30% of Japan’s total energy supply) and reassessed its energy supply and demand as well as its seismic vulnerability. This allowed the owner and design team to reassess the energy, comfort, sustainability, and seismic design requirements for this project—ultimately leading to a much more innovative, integrated, comfortable, healthy, and resilient design solution.

The project site is a five-minute walk from Akihabara Station, and the longer axis of the site is 70 m (230 feet) in length, faces westward, and overlooks a metropolitan expressway. These constraints immediately established several energy, daylight, noise, and view design challenges for the hot and humid summer climate of Tokyo.

Energy Efficiency
Using a passive first approach, an exterior “sudare screen,” or Japanese traditional blind (Photo 1), was used over the entire west-facing façade to block and filter direct solar gain while maintaining daylight and views. This sudare screen is positioned 1.5 m (~5 ft) in front of the glazed façade using the cantilevered floor structure as overhangs. The screen is made of “Y”-shaped aluminum bars, providing a delicate filtering of light. Clear double glazing with automatically controlled bottom-up or “climbing” blinds also provide solar shading while still allowing exterior views.

The sudare screen creates a safe service space for maintenance of exterior installed mechanical systems, and even provides lightning protection, ultimately providing six functions for a single cost (façade, shading, reflecting daylight, service balcony, maintaining views, and lightning protection).

© Rainer Viertlböck

Daylighting is maximized by controlling the light coming through the windows with automatic solar adjustment of the angle of the blind slats every 10 minutes. Through post-occupancy evaluation, which was completed in February 2016, more than 80% of the occupants were satisfied with the indoor lighting conditions noting that it was “bright enough” and “not too bright” (no presence of glare). Ceiling-integrated LED lighting, and controls for dimming or turning off lighting in vacant areas using daylight and motion sensors, extend the value of the energy-saving façade design to the indoor environment.

With direct solar heat gains mitigated and daylight and lighting optimized, a properly sized, high-efficiency HVAC system could be designed. A custom, radiant ceiling panel heating/cooling system was designed to facilitate integration of hot/cold water piping with lighting and low-velocity (slight) airflow. This slight airflow concept came from the biomimetic memory of experiencing a natural breeze under the shade of a tree. Small fans, functioning as diffusers, provide the slight airflow behind the inclined radiant panels and allow greater variation in temperature setpoints.


Thermal loads in the interior zone, where the temperature does not significantly change, are met by the radiant ceiling panel system.

However, the variable thermal load near the exterior windows is met using an active chilled beam (Figure 1).

Click image for Figures 2 and 3

© Forward Stroke

Together, this zoned approach provides for a very efficient distribution of both energy and comfort.
Other energy-reduction strategies include active plug-load management and geoexchange. Each desk is equipped with an electric outlet or receptacle capable of showing electricity consumption for that desk. It is also equipped with a sensor that detects an occupant’s presence, and the power is automatically turned off when nobody is present.

Earth-to-air energy exchange occurs using an underground trench in the seismic isolation layer to preheat or precool outdoor air. In addition, well water for direct thermal exchange is used as an untapped natural resource in the lower level air handlers.

Indoor Air Quality and Thermal Comfort
Excellent indoor air quality is maintained throughout the year by using air-handling units with desiccant-based dehumidification, a dedicated outdoor air system (DOAS), and proper control of the quantity of outdoor air based on CO2 concentration. The minimum quantity of outdoor air, which is taken through the air handlers, is supplied to the space above the radiant ceiling panels. This air is continuously returned at the floor level and is then returned to the rooftop air handlers. Figure 6 shows indoor CO2 concentration data on the vertical axis, which was measured by floor and time of day when the air handlers were in operation, and the average temperatures of each season (summer, shoulder seasons, and winter) on the horizontal axis. CO2 concentration has been maintained around 707 ppm throughout the year, indicating very good air quality. Additionally, MERV 13 filtration of supply air was used to control respirable particulate matter, pollen, and dust.

Using a detailed three-dimensional building information model (BIM) and computational fluid dynamics (CFD), comfort verification of the radiant cooling system was confirmed during the design phase. Additionally, experiments were conducted with subjects in a mock-up research laboratory to verify comfort in areas using the slight airflow (Figure 7).

The mock-up research and lab experiment, with over 150 participants, confirmed comfort in over 75% of the participants using higher temperature setpoints with a slight airflow, demonstrating compliance with ASHRAE Standard 55-2010 (Figure 8). See Figure 9 for air temperature and MRT necessary for comfort of sedentary persons in summer clothing at 50% RH.

Mock-up verification room during the design phase using thermal mannequin.

Click image for Figures 4 and 5.

Innovation
The real innovation of the YKK80 building was in meeting the challenges brought forth by the 2011 disaster and the entire owner, design, and construction teams’ commitment to use an integrated design process in response. The key innovations include: the multifunctional façade design; the “under-the-tree” breeze radiant cooling system; the design, mock-up, and lab comfort verification process; and the enhanced commissioning and ongoing measurement and verification. Today, YKK80 is one of the lowest energy consuming offices in Japan with verified occupant comfort (Figure 10).

Beyond energy savings and comfort, YKK invites visitors on regular facility tours and uses graphic-based data from their building energy management system (BEMS) to communicate the value of energy and water reduction strategies. Another innovative feature is a state-of-the-art, real-time earthquake detection system designed to provide immediate response and safety information for occupants. The entire building rests on seismic isolation pads.

Operation and Maintenance

Two years of performance verification was included in each team members contract and uses sophisticated BEMS data to support operation and maintenance. The entire team (owner, designer, contractor, manufacturers, and operators) will participate in this ongoing performance verification until two years after occupancy. Detailed, real-time monitoring of energy and environmental systems (cooling/heating, plumbing systems, water use, electricity, and lighting) is provided by the building automation system (BAS).
This information is reported monthly at a commissioning meeting and contributes to ongoing energy-savings and improved occupant comfort.

Figure 11 shows one year of actual monthly operating data as compared to the ASHRAE/IES Standard 90.1-2007 baseline and energy simulation.

Cost Effectiveness
YKK80 used an integrated design process to optimize the whole building as a system and to use single elements, such as the sudare screen or the sloped radiant ceiling panels, for multiple functions. Still, the initial investment was greater than a conventional similar office building.

The increase in the initial (2013) investment was JPY720 million (~USD$7.2 million) or JPY34,418/m2 (~USD$32/ft2). The present day utility cost savings are JPY66 million (~USD$630,000) per year, or JPY3,155/m2 (USD$2.8/ft2), which is 52% less than a similar sized Tokyo office building. Using a simple payback analysis, this will require just under 11 years to pay back the additional investment—assuming utility costs do not increase. Even with a modest productivity gain of 5% (much higher increases have been documented in other green office buildings) this 11-year payback period would be less than two years.

Environmental Impact
The actual reduction in CO2 emissions is 22.6 kg-CO2/m2 (4.64 lb/ft2) or 32% below the baseline (CO2 emission factor in Tokyo, electricity: 0.496 kg-CO2/kWh [1.1 lb-CO2/kWh]; natural gas: 2.23 kg-CO2/kWh [4.9 lb-CO2/kWh]; and tap water: 3.129 kg-CO2/m3 [0.19534 lb/ft3]). This building also incorporated high-efficiency water-saving equipment (water closets: 3.8 L [1 gallon U.S.] water per flush, faucets with 14-second shut-off timer), and currently consumes 65% less tap water than that of an ordinary office building in Japan. In addition, 100% of the non-tap water necessary for a biofilm process is provided using treated wastewater and reclaimed rainwater.

Social Engagement
YKK understands the importance of being a good corporate citizen and integrating themselves with the local community. Examples of its community engagement include: using outdoor plants (with signage) on its site that have been present in its neighborhood since the Edo period (approximately 1615 to 1868); promoting farm-to-table food using their rooftop garden; and offering local handicraft manufacturers opportunities to hold workshops and exhibition events using the area around the building entrance. 

Conclusion
Based on the latest data from Tokyo Metropolitan Government, YKK80 energy performance is in the top 1% of the 465 buildings sampled.

Focusing on the initial project goals of energy-savings, comfort, health, seismic safety, and cost-effectiveness through life-cycle design, the YKK80 building has clearly met, and even exceeded these goals—providing a new benchmark for high performance office buildings in Japan. •

About the Authors
Susumu Horikawa, P.Eng., is a executive officer, principal, mechanical and electrical engineering division, Kitaro Mizuide, Ph.D., P.Eng., is a general manager of the mechanical and electrical engineering division, and Taro Hongo is a mechanical engineer at NIKKEN SEKKEI, Japan.

Related media


Photo Gallery

Edit ModuleShow Tags

Tell Your Story

Every building has a story.

Share yours.

Have a great project you want to share? HPB readers want to know what lessons you learned. Click here to download the HPB Author's Guide.

Edit Module

Connect With Us

 

Edit Module